Next Boyfriend

Dating Trends · 9 min read

The 'De-Influencing' Trend and Its Impact on Romantic Aspirations

February 2023 saw the rise of 'de-influencing' online, which has subtly influenced dating trends. This article explores how the rejection of consumerism impacts perceptions of ideal partners and relationships.

The 'De-Influencing' Trend and Its Impact on Romantic Aspirations — Dating Trends article on Next Boyfriend

Sophia Rodriguez · February 14, 2023

Our take

The rise of “de‑influencing” isn’t just a fleeting social‑media hashtag; it’s a cultural reset that’s quietly reshaping what women want from love. When the glossy veneer of influencer lifestyles starts to crack, daters begin to crave substance over sparkle—seeking partners who value honesty, shared purpose, and everyday joy rather than designer labels or follower counts. For modern women navigating a dating world saturated with curated perfection, understanding this shift offers a powerful compass toward more authentic, fulfilling connections.

Key takeaways

  • De‑influencing emerged in early 2023 as a backlash against the endless stream of product pushes and aspirational lifestyles flooding TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube.
  • Evolutionary psychologists argue that humans once used visible wealth as a shortcut to assess a partner’s ability to provide resources.
  • Maya, 29, marketing associate: “I used to swipe right on guys who posted yacht photos and designer sneakers.
  • Performative profiles often share telltale signs:

Understanding De‑Influencing: From Consumer Culture to Dating Culture

De‑influencing emerged in early 2023 as a backlash against the endless stream of product pushes and aspirational lifestyles flooding TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. Creators began posting videos titled “Things I’m Not Buying” or “Why I Stopped Following This Trend,” urging audiences to question whether a purchase truly adds value or merely feeds a cycle of consumption. The movement quickly expanded beyond shopping habits, prompting people to scrutinize the narratives they consume about success, beauty, and happiness.

In the realm of romance, those same critical lenses turned inward. If a lavish vacation or a designer handbag no longer signals worth, then the markers we use to judge potential partners start to shift as well. Women began asking: Does this person’s online presence reflect who they really are, or is it a polished performance? Does their lifestyle align with my values, or is it merely a display of status? The de‑influencing mindset encourages daters to look past the highlight reel and focus on the substance behind the screen.

Research from the Journal of Consumer Psychology (2022) shows that exposure to materialistic cues lowers relationship satisfaction and increases the tendency to prioritize superficial traits in mates. Conversely, when individuals engage in anti‑consumptive reflection—like de‑influencing—they report higher importance placed on emotional intimacy and shared goals. This psychological pivot provides a fertile ground for healthier dating patterns.

The Psychology Behind Materialism in Partner Selection

Evolutionary psychologists argue that humans once used visible wealth as a shortcut to assess a partner’s ability to provide resources. In modern societies, however, that shortcut often leads to mismatched expectations. A 2021 study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin found that participants who scored high on materialism were more likely to judge potential partners based on external symbols of success (e.g., car brand, clothing labels) rather than internal qualities like kindness or empathy.

De‑influencing disrupts this heuristic by encouraging skepticism toward those symbols. When you start questioning why a luxury watch matters, you also start questioning why a partner’s wristwatch should influence your attraction. This mental shift opens space for traits that truly predict long‑term compatibility: emotional regulation, communication style, and shared life philosophy.

Practically, adopting a de‑influencing lens means pausing before swiping right on someone whose profile screams “luxury lifestyle.” Ask yourself: What am I really responding to? Is it the person, or the lifestyle they’re advertising? By naming the impulse, you weaken its grip and create room for more authentic connections.

Real‑Life Stories: When De‑Influencing Changed a Love Life

Maya, 29, marketing associate: “I used to swipe right on guys who posted yacht photos and designer sneakers. After a month of watching de‑influencing creators talk about ‘quiet luxury’ and ‘intentional living,’ I realized I was chasing a fantasy. I matched with Jake, who posts about hiking, cooking from scratch, and volunteering at an animal shelter. Our first date was a picnic in the park with homemade sandwiches—no filters, no pretension. Six months later, we’re still talking about values, not vacations.”

Leila, 34, freelance writer: “My ex constantly posted about his high‑paying job and expensive watches. I felt inferior, even though I loved his humor and kindness. After a de‑influencing binge, I recognized I was measuring his worth by his Instagram aesthetic. I ended the relationship and started dating someone who shares my love for indie bookstores and late‑night conversations. The relief of not having to ‘keep up’ was immediate.”

These vignettes illustrate a common pattern: once the external scorecard is questioned, internal chemistry can finally take the lead.

How to Spot Performative Dating Profiles

Performative profiles often share telltale signs:

  • Heavy reliance on luxury symbols – frequent photos with high‑end cars, designer bags, or exotic locations that feel staged rather than candid.
  • Curated perfection – every image is professionally lit, filtered, and showcases a highlight reel with little glimpse of everyday life.
  • Status‑focused bio – phrases like “entrepreneur,” “CEO,” “travel connoisseur,” or “living the dream” without mention of hobbies, values, or personality quirks.
  • Engagement bait – posts that explicitly ask for likes, follows, or comments to boost visibility rather than foster genuine interaction.

When you notice these cues, pause. Consider sending a message that invites authenticity: “I noticed you love traveling—what’s a trip that taught you something unexpected about yourself?” This shifts the conversation from spectacle to story.

Building Authentic Connections: Practical Steps

  1. Audit your own feed – Unfollow accounts that make you feel inadequate or that glorify material excess. Replace them with creators who discuss mindfulness, budgeting, or genuine hobbies.
  2. Define your non‑negotiables – Write down three core values (e.g., honesty, kindness, growth) and three lifestyle preferences (e.g., enjoys cooking, values downtime, seeks adventure). Use this list as a filter when reviewing profiles.
  3. Ask open‑ended questions – Early conversations should explore experiences, beliefs, and aspirations rather than job titles or possessions. Example: “What’s a recent challenge that changed your perspective on life?”
  4. Embrace low‑stakes dates – Opt for coffee walks, museum visits, or cooking classes instead of expensive dinners or bottle service. These settings reveal how a person behaves in everyday scenarios.
  5. Reflect post‑date – After each meeting, jot down what felt genuine and what felt performative. Over time, patterns emerge that guide you toward healthier matches.

Shared Values Over Shared Brands: A Guide to Value‑Based Dating

Values act as the invisible architecture of a relationship. When two people share a similar outlook on money, family, growth, or spirituality, conflicts tend to be resolved with empathy rather than power struggles.

To uncover values early:

  • Storytelling prompts – Ask, “Tell me about a time you stood up for something you believed in.” The answer reveals moral courage and priorities.
  • Future‑visioning – Discuss where each sees themselves in five years. Look for alignment in lifestyle pace (e.g., both want a slower, intentional life) rather than specific income figures.
  • Conflict style – Pose a hypothetical disagreement (e.g., “What would you do if we wanted to spend the weekend differently?”) and observe whether the response leans toward compromise, negotiation, or insistence on personal preference.

Brands can be enjoyable, but they are poor proxies for the deep compatibility that sustains love through life’s inevitable ups and downs.

Embracing Simple Pleasures: Date Ideas That Align with De‑Influencing

De‑influencing champions experiences that enrich the inner life rather than the outer image. Consider these date concepts:

  • Sunrise yoga in a local park – Focuses on presence, health, and shared tranquility.
  • DIY pizza night – Collaborative, inexpensive, and reveals teamwork and humor.
  • Community volunteering – Builds empathy and shows how a partner engages with the world beyond themselves.
  • Bookstore browse & chat – Encourages intellectual curiosity and offers low‑pressure conversation starters.
  • Stargazing with a blanket – Invites wonder, vulnerability, and a break from screens.

These activities naturally surface qualities like patience, creativity, and kindness—traits that de‑influencers increasingly prioritize.

Navigating Social Pressure When Your Partner Isn’t “Influencer‑Worthy”

Even with a de‑influencing mindset, external pressures linger. Friends might comment, “Why aren’t you dating someone more… exciting?” or family may worry about financial stability. Handling this gracefully requires confidence in your own criteria.

  • Re‑frame the narrative – When questioned, respond with pride: “I’m looking for someone who makes me feel calm and understood, not just impressed.”
  • Set boundaries – Politely decline to discuss your love life in detail if the conversation turns judgmental.
  • Show, don’t tell – Invite skeptics to a low‑key date (e.g., a picnic) so they can witness the genuine connection firsthand.
  • Remember the data – Longitudinal studies (e.g., the Harvard Study of Adult Development) consistently find that relationship satisfaction hinges on emotional intimacy, not external wealth.

By anchoring yourself in research and personal conviction, you can weather the noise and stay true to what truly matters.

Expert Insights: What Therapists Say About Materialism and Relationship Satisfaction

We consulted Dr. Amira Patel, a licensed clinical psychologist specializing in couples therapy. She notes:

“When clients come in dissatisfied with their relationships, a common thread is a mismatch between what they say they want—like kindness, humor, emotional availability—and what they actively pursue in partners, often dictated by social media imagery. De‑influencing works as a cognitive interruptor; it forces a pause that lets people realign their actions with their stated values.”

Dr. Patel recommends a “values audit” exercise: list five traits you admire in a partner, then rate your last three dates on how well they displayed those traits. The discrepancy often highlights where consumer‑culture bias is creeping in.

Additionally, relationship coach Marcus Lee advises: “Treat your dating profile like a personal manifesto. If it reads like a product catalog, rewrite it to reflect your inner world. Authenticity attracts authenticity.”

Conclusion: Crafting a Relationship Rooted in Authenticity

The de‑influencing wave is more than a trend; it’s an invitation to reclaim agency over what we deem valuable—both in the marketplace and in matters of the heart. By questioning the glossy narratives that flood our feeds, we create space to seek partners who resonate with our core selves rather than our curated personas.

For women navigating today’s dating landscape, this shift offers a clear path: prioritize emotional intelligence, shared values, and genuine experiences over flashy displays of wealth or status. Implementing the practical steps outlined—auditing influences, defining values, choosing meaningful dates, and leaning on expert guidance—can transform dating from a performance into a partnership built on trust, mutual growth, and lasting joy.

Ultimately, the most compelling love story isn’t the one that looks perfect on a screen; it’s the one that feels true in the quiet moments, where two people choose each other not for what they own, but for who they are. Let your next chapter be written in authenticity, and watch how the right love story unfolds.

Questions about Dating Trends

Is online dating declining?

Engagement with the largest apps has softened and users report more fatigue, but online dating remains the most common way couples meet. The shift is toward smaller, intent-specific platforms and renewed interest in meeting offline rather than an outright decline.

Are people dating less than they used to?

Younger cohorts report fewer partners and later first relationships than previous generations at the same age. Whether that reflects intentional selectivity or reduced opportunity is genuinely contested in the research.

What is the biggest change in dating over the last five years?

Explicitness about intent. Stating what you are looking for at the outset has moved from unusual to expected, largely as a reaction against situationships and open-ended ambiguity.

Keep reading

Comments

No comments yet.