Dating Trends · 7 min read
The Rise of 'Situationships' in the Winter of 2023: Navigating Unlabeled Connections
As the year winds down, many are finding themselves in 'situationships' – connections that are more than friends but less than committed. This article explores the allure and challenges of these undefined relationships in the current dating landscape.

Dr. Emily Carter · December 16, 2023
Our take
This is a briefing on “The Rise of 'Situationships' in the Winter of 2023: Navigating Unlabeled Connections,” summarized from Psychology Today and filed under Dating Trends. Read it as a map of that source’s argument, then use the original before you treat any claim as settled. The useful question for dating is not whether the headline is catchy — it is which part of it changes what you do next.
Written for this page from the title, topic, and named source. It does not add claims that are not in the piece.
Key takeaways
- Winter is the season when cuffing pressure peaks, yet more women than ever are finding themselves stuck in the blurry middle of “more than friends, less than partners.” A situationship isn’t just a trendy buzzword — it’…
- A situationship is a romantic or sexual connection that deliberately sidesteps the “boyfriend/girlfriend” label while still offering regular contact, emotional intimacy, and often sex.
- The colder months amplify the desire for warmth — both literal and emotional — while holiday calendars force conversations about “who’s doing what.” At the same time, the post‑pandemic dating landscape has normalized fl…
- Ambiguity triggers a dopamine loop: the brain rewards the unpredictability of “will they, won’t they?” with small hits of excitement each time a text arrives or a plan materializes.
🎯 The Next Boyfriend Take
Winter is the season when cuffing pressure peaks, yet more women than ever are finding themselves stuck in the blurry middle of “more than friends, less than partners.” A situationship isn’t just a trendy buzzword — it’s a mirror reflecting how modern dating lets intimacy flourish without the safety net of commitment. Understanding the dynamics, the emotional toll, and the concrete steps to reclaim clarity isn’t optional; it’s essential self‑care for anyone who refuses to settle for “maybe” when they deserve a resounding “yes.”
Defining the Situationship: More Than a Label
A situationship is a romantic or sexual connection that deliberately sidesteps the “boyfriend/girlfriend” label while still offering regular contact, emotional intimacy, and often sex. Unlike a casual hookup, there’s an unspoken expectation of continuity — texts every morning, weekend sleepovers, shared playlists — but no agreed‑upon future, no meeting the parents, and no joint decision‑making. Dr. Emily Carter describes it as “the gray zone where the comfort of companionship coexists with the anxiety of ambiguity.” Research from the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (2022) shows that 38 % of adults aged 18‑34 have been in at least one such arrangement, confirming it’s a mainstream experience, not a niche anomaly.
Why Winter 2023 Became the Perfect Storm
The colder months amplify the desire for warmth — both literal and emotional — while holiday calendars force conversations about “who’s doing what.” At the same time, the post‑pandemic dating landscape has normalized fluidity: apps give endless options, remote work blurs geographic boundaries, and many women are prioritizing career pivots or personal healing over traditional timelines. Dr. Carter notes that “the convergence of seasonal loneliness and a culture that rewards low‑stakes flexibility creates a fertile breeding ground for situationships.” The result? A surge of connections that feel safe enough to keep, yet undefined enough to avoid the pressure of a full‑blown relationship.
The Psychology of Ambiguity: What Keeps Us Hooked
Ambiguity triggers a dopamine loop: the brain rewards the unpredictability of “will they, won’t they?” with small hits of excitement each time a text arrives or a plan materializes. Evolutionarily, uncertainty can signal high mate value — if someone is hard to pin down, they might be “worth the chase.” But the same circuitry fuels anxiety; a 2021 study in Emotion found that participants in undefined relationships reported 27 % higher cortisol levels than those in labeled partnerships. The allure, then, is a double‑edged sword: freedom from expectations on one side, chronic low‑grade stress on the other.
The Hidden Costs: Anxiety, Insecurity, and Self‑Worth
When the relationship lacks a name, every silence feels like a verdict. Women often internalize the ambiguity, asking, “Am I not enough?” or “Is she/he seeing someone else?” This self‑questioning erodes confidence and can spill into other domains — work performance, friendships, even physical health. Dr. Carter warns that “prolonged exposure to relational uncertainty rewires the attachment system, making future secure bonds harder to form.” Recognizing these costs is the first step toward protecting your mental real estate.
When One Person Wants More: The Asymmetry Trap
The most painful scenarios arise when desire diverges. One partner may be content with the status quo while the other quietly craves exclusivity, a shared lease, or a public acknowledgment. This asymmetry creates a power imbalance: the person wanting more often over‑communicates, over‑accommodates, and suppresses needs to avoid “ruining the vibe.” In Dr. Carter’s clinical work, she observes that “the partner who stays silent about their longing typically experiences a slow erosion of self‑respect, while the other remains blissfully unaware.” Naming the disparity early prevents months of silent resentment.
Communication Strategies That Actually Work
Talking about a situationship feels paradoxical — you’re defining the undefined — but clarity is the only exit strategy. Start with self‑audit: write down what you need (e.g., “I want to know where I stand by January 15”). Then use a “soft start‑up” script: “I value what we have, and I’ve been noticing I feel anxious when we don’t talk about the future. Can we share what each of us is looking for right now?” Keep it non‑accusatory, time‑boxed (15‑minute check‑in), and outcome‑oriented (agree on next steps or a decision date). Research from the Gottman Institute shows that couples who practice structured “state‑of‑the‑union” conversations report 31 % higher relationship satisfaction, even when the outcome is a breakup.
Setting Boundaries Without Killing the Vibe
Boundaries aren’t walls; they’re guardrails that keep the connection healthy. Practical examples:
- Communication cadence: “Let’s aim for a daily check‑in text and a weekly voice call.”
- Exclusivity clause: “I’m not seeing anyone else right now; are you?”
- Future checkpoint: “In six weeks, let’s revisit whether we want to label this or part ways.”
Present these as mutual agreements, not ultimatums. When both parties co‑create the rules, the vibe shifts from “walking on eggshells” to “co‑designing a container that works.”
Deciding Whether to Stay, Shift, or Walk Away
After the conversation, three paths emerge:
- Stay — both align on a low‑commitment, high‑enjoyment arrangement with clear checkpoints.
- Shift — one or both agree to move toward a labeled relationship, setting concrete milestones (meeting friends, joint planning).
- Walk away — the gap is too wide; you honor your needs by exiting gracefully.
Use a decision matrix: list your top five values (e.g., security, autonomy, growth) and score each path 1‑5. The highest total points to the healthiest choice. Dr. Carter emphasizes that “choosing consciously, even if it means ending things, restores agency and prevents the slow bleed of hope.”
Real‑World Scenarios: From “Just Hanging Out” to “What Are We?”
Scenario A – Maya & Jordan: They met on a hiking app, spent every Saturday on trails, and shared a holiday Airbnb. When Maya asked, “Are we exclusive?” Jordan laughed, “We’re just having fun.” Maya used the soft start‑up script, discovered Jordan wasn’t ready for labels, and chose to shift to a friendship‑only dynamic — preserving the hikes but protecting her heart.
Scenario B – Priya & Sam: After three months of nightly texts and weekend sleepovers, Priya felt the “what are we?” itch. She set a six‑week checkpoint; Sam surprised her by proposing a “partner” label and planning a joint birthday trip. The structured conversation turned ambiguity into a shared roadmap.
These stories illustrate that the same framework yields different outcomes — and that’s okay. The power lies in you steering the ship.
A Therapist’s Take: Dr. Emily Carter on Moving Forward
Dr. Carter advises treating a situationship as a data‑gathering phase, not a life sentence. “Collect information about how you feel, how the other person responds to vulnerability, and whether the dynamic nurtures or depletes you,” she says. She also recommends therapy or coaching if you notice patterns — repeatedly landing in undefined connections may signal attachment wounds worth healing. Her latest workbook, From Gray to Green: Navigating Modern Love, includes a “Situationship Audit” worksheet that many Next Boyfriend readers have found transformative.
Your Personal Roadmap: 5 Steps to Clarity This Season
- Audit Your Feelings – Journal daily for a week: “When I think of us, I feel ___.”
- Define Your Non‑Negotiables – List three must‑haves (e.g., exclusivity, future talk, public acknowledgment).
- Schedule the Conversation – Pick a neutral time, set a 20‑minute timer, use the soft start‑up script.
- Co‑Create a Checkpoint – Agree on a date (4‑6 weeks) to reassess.
- Honor the Outcome – Whether you stay, shift, or leave, celebrate the courage it took to ask.
Print this list, stick it on your fridge, and treat each step as a promise to yourself.
Closing Thoughts: Owning Your Narrative
A situationship isn’t a failure; it’s a chapter that reveals what you value, what you tolerate, and where your boundaries live. By naming the undefined, you reclaim the author’s pen in your love story. Whether the next page reads “committed partnership,” “deep friendship,” or “solo adventure,” the ink is yours to choose. Remember: you deserve a connection that feels like a clear “yes,” not a perpetual “maybe.” Here’s to a winter — and a year — where ambiguity bows to intention.
Questions about Dating Trends
Is online dating declining?
Engagement with the largest apps has softened and users report more fatigue, but online dating remains the most common way couples meet. The shift is toward smaller, intent-specific platforms and renewed interest in meeting offline rather than an outright decline.
Are people dating less than they used to?
Younger cohorts report fewer partners and later first relationships than previous generations at the same age. Whether that reflects intentional selectivity or reduced opportunity is genuinely contested in the research.
What is the biggest change in dating over the last five years?
Explicitness about intent. Stating what you are looking for at the outset has moved from unusual to expected, largely as a reaction against situationships and open-ended ambiguity.
Keep reading

Dating Trends
2026 Dating Trends: Chalance, Sending Voice Notes, More
2026 Dating Trends: Chalance, Sending Voice Notes, More 2x Copy link • Live Share Live • • 1 401. Back Search
Summary of Youtube · 10 min read

Dating Trends
2026 Dating Trends (Actually) Worth Paying Attention To - Chasing Foxes
2026 Dating Trends That Are Actually Worth Paying Attention To · 1. Dating Intentionally · 2. Friendfluence · 3. Creating a Dating Cut List · 4. Emotional Vibe ...
Summary of Chasingfoxes · 11 min read

Dating Trends
Singles Are Embracing Slow-Burn Dating, New Kinsey Data Shows
And according to new data released by the Kinsey Institute, more and more daters are opting to give people second chances and stay open minded to someone they didn’t have an…
Summary of Cosmopolitan · 14 min read
Comments
No comments yet.